[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <370abd87-6080-e3af-3e46-08982ff98006@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 12:45:38 -0500
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, ardb@...nel.org,
nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com, sjitindarsingh@...il.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename
args to unwind()
On 4/8/22 09:44, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:51:38AM -0600, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
>> Hey Mark Rutland, Mark Brown,
>>
>> Could you please review the rest of the patches in the series when you can?
>
> Sorry, I was expecting a new version with some of my comments
> addressed, in case that had effects on subsequent patches.
>
>> Also, many of the patches have received a Reviewed-By from you both.
>> So, after I send the next version out, can we upstream those ones?
>
> I would very much like to upstream the ones I have given a Reviewed-by.
>
> Given those were conditional on some adjustments (e.g. actually filling
> out comments), do you mind if I pick those into a series now?
>
> Then, once that's picked, you can rebase the rest atop, and we can
> review that.
>
So, do you want me to address the comments so far and send the next version?
I can do it ASAP.
Madhavan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists