[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b26a4e2-93a8-8b3f-20c3-c1593ea0d48b@lenbrook.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 18:28:03 -0400
From: Kevin Groeneveld <kgroeneveld@...brook.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix regression with uart scripts
On 2022-04-08 13:39, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 1. Patch title should reflect the change introduced, so the title is not
> apt, pls revise
In hindsight the title was not very descriptive. I will update and send
a v2. Maybe something like:
dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix init of uart scripts
> 2. Is this in response to rmk's report, if so, please add reported-by
No. I am not even aware of any report on this issue. I discovered the
issue on my own and found the problem commit by doing a bisect.
> 3. Lastly, I would like to see some tested by for this patch..
I have tested on imx5, imx6 and imx8 systems. I will add some brief
details of this to the commit message in the v2 patch. I am not sure if
I as the author should include a Tested-by tag.
>> Fixes: b98ce2f4e32b ("dmaengine: imx-sdma: add uart rom script")
>
> cc: stable ?
That sounds reasonable. I am relatively new to submitting kernel patches
and that thought never crossed by mind.
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists