[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220411154803.GA26372@hu-pkondeti-hyd.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 21:18:03 +0530
From: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>
To: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
CC: <balbi@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: EP clear halt leading to incorrect submission
of delayed_status
Hi Wesley,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 06:53:36PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> The usb_ep_clear_halt() API can be called from the function driver, and
> translates to dwc3_gadget_ep_set_halt(). This routine is shared with when
> the host issues a clear feature ENDPOINT_HALT, and is differentiated by the
> protocol argument. If the following sequence occurs, there can be a
> situation where the delayed_status flag is improperly cleared for the wrong
> SETUP transaction:
>
> 1. Vendor specific control transfer returns USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS.
> 2. DWC3 gadget sets dwc->delayed_status to '1'.
> 3. Another function driver issues a usb_ep_clear_halt() call.
> 4. DWC3 gadget issues dwc3_stop_active_transfer() and sets
> DWC3_EP_PENDING_CLEAR_STALL.
> 5. EP command complete interrupt triggers for the end transfer, and
> dwc3_ep0_send_delayed_status() is allowed to run, as delayed_status
> is '1' due to step#1.
> 6. STATUS phase is sent, and delayed_status is cleared.
> 7. Vendor specific control transfer is finished being handled, and issues
> usb_composite_setup_continue(). This results in queuing of a data
> phase.
>
> Cache the protocol flag so that DWC3 gadget is aware of when the clear halt
> is due to a SETUP request from the host versus when it is sourced from a
> function driver. This allows for the EP command complete interrupt to know
> if it needs to issue a delayed status phase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h | 1 +
> drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c | 1 +
> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
> index 5c9d467195a6..55f98485c54c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
> @@ -1272,6 +1272,7 @@ struct dwc3 {
> unsigned connected:1;
> unsigned softconnect:1;
> unsigned delayed_status:1;
> + unsigned clear_stall_protocol:1;
> unsigned ep0_bounced:1;
> unsigned ep0_expect_in:1;
> unsigned has_hibernation:1;
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
> index 1064be5518f6..aa8476da222d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
> @@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ void dwc3_ep0_send_delayed_status(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> unsigned int direction = !dwc->ep0_expect_in;
>
> dwc->delayed_status = false;
> + dwc->clear_stall_protocol = 0;
>
> if (dwc->ep0state != EP0_STATUS_PHASE)
> return;
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> index ab725d2262d6..c427ddae016f 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> @@ -2152,6 +2152,7 @@ int __dwc3_gadget_ep_set_halt(struct dwc3_ep *dep, int value, int protocol)
> if (dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING ||
> (dep->flags & DWC3_EP_DELAY_STOP)) {
> dep->flags |= DWC3_EP_PENDING_CLEAR_STALL;
> + dwc->clear_stall_protocol = protocol;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3483,7 +3484,7 @@ static void dwc3_gadget_endpoint_command_complete(struct dwc3_ep *dep,
> }
>
> dep->flags &= ~(DWC3_EP_STALL | DWC3_EP_WEDGE);
> - if (dwc->delayed_status)
> + if (dwc->clear_stall_protocol)
> dwc3_ep0_send_delayed_status(dwc);
> }
>
Is it safe to maintain clear_stall_protocol per dwc3 instance? What if
CLEAR_FEATURE(halt_endpoint) and usb_ep_clear_halt() are interleaved and
We come here as part of usb_ep_clear_halt()'s endpoint command complete.
We may simply send the delayed status corresponding to the protocol clear
stall.
We can still maintain a global flag if we cache endpoint number in it so
that we can cross check against the endpoint for which completion received.
Thanks,
Pavan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists