[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YlRNPyxHcNRQE/5A@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 18:46:07 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] device property: Allow error pointer to be passed
to fwnode APIs
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:28:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:50:11PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 09:48:40PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Some of the fwnode APIs might return an error pointer instead of NULL
> > > or valid fwnode handle. The result of such API call may be considered
> > > optional and hence the test for it is usually done in a form of
> > >
> > > fwnode = fwnode_find_reference(...);
> > > if (IS_ERR(fwnode))
> > > ...error handling...
> > >
> > > Nevertheless the resulting fwnode may have bumped the reference count
> > > and hence caller of the above API is obliged to call fwnode_handle_put().
> > > Since fwnode may be not valid either as NULL or error pointer the check
> > > has to be performed there. This approach uglifies the code and adds
> > > a point of making a mistake, i.e. forgetting about error point case.
> > >
> > > To prevent this, allow an error pointer to be passed to the fwnode APIs.
> >
> > Rafael and Greg, if this okay for you, can the first three patches be
> > applied, so we will have at least the fix in and consider constification
> > a further work?
>
> Give us a chance, you sent this on friday and are asking about it first
> thing Monday morning?
>
> Please go and review other patches sent on the list to help us catch up.
OK! Reviewed (actually commented on) a few patches so far.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists