[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8d3ed7196d09f5f6a61d605a94613f792ab501b.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 18:03:51 +0200
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
Maíra Canal <maira.canal@....br>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: hongxing.zhu@....com, robh@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
helgaas@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-imx@....com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: imx6: Replace legacy gpio interface for gpiod
interface
Hi Maíra, hi Lorenzo,
Am Montag, dem 11.04.2022 um 13:59 +0200 schrieb Francesco Dolcini:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:46:32AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:23:39PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:03:11PM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> > > > Considering the current transition of the GPIO subsystem, remove all
> > > > dependencies of the legacy GPIO interface (linux/gpio.h and linux
> > > > /of_gpio.h) and replace it with the descriptor-based GPIO approach.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@....br>
> > > > ---
> > > > V1 -> V2: Rewrite commit log and subject line to match PCI subsystem standard
> > > > V2 -> v3: Change gpiod_set_value_cansleep for gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 30 +++++++++------------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Maira, Lucas,
> > >
> > > what's this patch status ? Please let me know.
The patch looks fine to me now, however...
> >
> > Thank you for the feedback. Since I sent v3, I didn't get any feedback from the community.
> >
> > If you have any feedback, I would gladly work on it.
>
> Just for you to know that it will likely conflict with
> 'PCI: imx6: Fix PERST# start-up sequence' [0] that is also still waiting
> for some additional feedback.
... they do conflict and I guess the functional fix for the reset
sequence should have priority over this cleanup. Maíra, may I ask you
to respin your patch as soon as Francescos fix is in? I promise to not
let it fall through the cracks again.
Regards,
Lucas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists