[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7d28775-2dbe-7d97-7053-e182bd5be51c@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:40:25 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
erdemaktas@...gle.com, Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 092/104] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV HLT hypercall
On 4/8/22 16:51, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> It also documents how it has to be used. So this looks more or less okay,
>> just rename "vmxip" to "interrupt_pending_delivery".
>
> If we're keeping the call back into SEAM, then this belongs in the path of
> apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr(), not in the HLT-exit path. To avoid multiple SEAMCALLS
> in a single exit, VCPU_EXREG_RVI can be added.
But apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr takes a PPR argument and that is not
available.
So I suppose you mean kvm_apic_has_interrupt? You would change that to
a callback, like
if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
return -1;
return static_call(kvm_x86_apic_has_interrupt)(vcpu);
}
and the default version would also be inlined in kvm_get_apic_interrupt,
like
- int vector = kvm_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu);
struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
u32 ppr;
- if (vector == -1)
+ if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
return -1;
+ __apic_update_ppr(apic, &ppr);
+ vector = apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr(apic, ppr);
Checking the SEAM state (which would likewise not be VCPU_EXREG_RVI, but
more like VCPU_EXREG_INTR_PENDING) would be done in the tdx case of
kvm_x86_apic_has_interrupt.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists