[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220411045527.13421-1-darcy.sh@antgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:55:27 +0800
From: "SU Hang" <darcy.sh@...group.com>
To: seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: <bp@...en8.de>, "SU Hang" <darcy.sh@...group.com>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
"Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
<jmattson@...gle.com>, <joro@...tes.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
<wanpengli@...cent.com>, <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive EPT violation RWX bits from EPTE RWX bits
I sincerely apologize to you and Palo for making this mistake due to my
negligence and lack of testing. Since the patches only care about macro
substitutions and no function changes, this makes me sloppy. Now I realize my
mistake.
Ashamed Hang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists