[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iUWLsZRV4StCzHuVUhEsOB5WURD2r_w3L+LEjoQEheog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:20:10 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
Cc: david <david@...morbit.com>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] x86/mce: relocate set{clear}_mce_nospec() functions
I notice that none of the folks from "X86 MM" are on the cc, added.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 12:49 PM Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Relocate the twin mce functions to arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> file where they belong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h | 52 -------------------------------
> arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/set_memory.h | 9 +++---
> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h
> index 78ca53512486..b45c4d27fd46 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h
> @@ -86,56 +86,4 @@ bool kernel_page_present(struct page *page);
>
> extern int kernel_set_to_readonly;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -/*
> - * Prevent speculative access to the page by either unmapping
> - * it (if we do not require access to any part of the page) or
> - * marking it uncacheable (if we want to try to retrieve data
> - * from non-poisoned lines in the page).
> - */
> -static inline int set_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn, bool unmap)
> -{
> - unsigned long decoy_addr;
> - int rc;
> -
> - /* SGX pages are not in the 1:1 map */
> - if (arch_is_platform_page(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))
> - return 0;
> - /*
> - * We would like to just call:
> - * set_memory_XX((unsigned long)pfn_to_kaddr(pfn), 1);
> - * but doing that would radically increase the odds of a
> - * speculative access to the poison page because we'd have
> - * the virtual address of the kernel 1:1 mapping sitting
> - * around in registers.
> - * Instead we get tricky. We create a non-canonical address
> - * that looks just like the one we want, but has bit 63 flipped.
> - * This relies on set_memory_XX() properly sanitizing any __pa()
> - * results with __PHYSICAL_MASK or PTE_PFN_MASK.
> - */
> - decoy_addr = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + (PAGE_OFFSET ^ BIT(63));
> -
> - if (unmap)
> - rc = set_memory_np(decoy_addr, 1);
> - else
> - rc = set_memory_uc(decoy_addr, 1);
> - if (rc)
> - pr_warn("Could not invalidate pfn=0x%lx from 1:1 map\n", pfn);
> - return rc;
> -}
> -#define set_mce_nospec set_mce_nospec
> -
> -/* Restore full speculative operation to the pfn. */
> -static inline int clear_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn)
> -{
> - return set_memory_wb((unsigned long) pfn_to_kaddr(pfn), 1);
> -}
> -#define clear_mce_nospec clear_mce_nospec
> -#else
> -/*
> - * Few people would run a 32-bit kernel on a machine that supports
> - * recoverable errors because they have too much memory to boot 32-bit.
> - */
> -#endif
> -
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_SET_MEMORY_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> index 38af155aaba9..93dde949f224 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> @@ -1925,6 +1925,53 @@ int set_memory_wb(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_memory_wb);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
It seems like the only X86_64 dependency in this routine is the
address bit 63 usage, so how about:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
return 0;
...and drop the ifdef?
Other than that you can add:
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists