[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YlS8swz1QScWdpke@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:41:39 -0600
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: fix __get_unaligned_be48() on 32 bit
platforms
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:20:47PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/11/22 13:00, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > Uhm, ping?
>
> What happened with the plan to move this function into the block layer?
> I'm asking this because if that function is moved your patch will conflict
> with the patch that moves that function.
I believe you're thinking of lower_48_bits() instead of this unaligned
accessor. It appears that patch hasn't been picked up yet though, and I am
assuming it should go through block.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists