[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba417ad0-a263-77c4-a7bd-a1e7c43fe6b7@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:37:41 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: display: Separate clock item lists by
compatible
On 11/04/2022 06:34, Samuel Holland wrote:
> So far, the binding and driver have relied on the fact that the H6
> clocks are both a prefix and a subset of the R40 clocks. This allows
> them to share the clocks/clock-names items and the clock-output-names
> order between the hardware variants.
>
> However, the D1 hardware has TCON TV0 and DSI, but no TCON TV1. This
> cannot be supported by the existing scheme because it puts a gap in the
> middle of the item lists. To prepare for adding D1 support, use separate
> lists for variants with different combinations of clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
> ---
>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists