[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c4b6eac-86d8-eb93-37a5-d0fa9bf2a7d2@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:42:42 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: aford@...conembedded.com, haibo.chen@....com,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: imx-esdhc: Update compatible
fallbacks
On 10/04/2022 21:35, Adam Ford wrote:
> The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller
> as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d.
>
> Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support
> HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d. After discussion with NXP,
> it turns out that the imx8qm should fall back to the imx8qxp, because
> those have some additional flags not present in the imx8mm.
>
> Mark the current state of the fallbacks as deprecated, and add the
> proper fallbacks so in the future, the deprecated combination can be
> removed and prevent any future devices from using the wrong fallback.
>
> Suggested-by: haibo.chen@....com
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists