linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: clean up comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YlQBgnjpkSurf9PZ@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:22:58 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc:     balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, joel@....id.au,
        andrew@...id.au, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com,
        alcooperx@...il.com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
        cai.huoqing@...ux.dev, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
        neal_liu@...eedtech.com, miles.chen@...iatek.com,
        balamanikandan.gunasundar@...rochip.com, macpaul.lin@...iatek.com,
        s.shtylyov@....ru, jakobkoschel@...il.com,
        stern@...land.harvard.edu, quic_wcheng@...cinc.com,
        yashsri421@...il.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        linux-geode@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: clean up comments

On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:08:28AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> SPDX
> *.h use /* */ style comments
> 
> For double words, remove
> with, also
> 
> Spelling replacements
> wayt to way
> wakup to wakeup
> Contrl to Control
> cheks to checks
> initiaization to initialization
> dyanmic to dynamic

Something really wrong with indentation above.

...

>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/amd5536udc.h       | 2 +-
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/ep0.c  | 2 +-
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/hub.c  | 2 +-
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h | 4 ++--
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c         | 2 +-
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c     | 4 ++--
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c             | 4 ++--
>  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/trace.h            | 2 +-

I believe that Greg's bot asks to split on per-driver basis.
OTOH I don't see anything that can be problematic if in one
change. So, it's up to maintainers then.

...

> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/amd5536udc.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/amd5536udc.h

>   * amd5536.h -- header for AMD 5536 UDC high/full speed USB device controller

At the same time you may drop the filename(s) from the file(s) as this very
one shows why it's good not to have a filename inside file.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko