[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1091118.1649680137@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:28:57 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-cachefs@...hat.com, xiang@...nel.org,
chao@...nel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
willy@...radead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com, bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com,
tao.peng@...ux.alibaba.com, gerry@...ux.alibaba.com,
eguan@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
luodaowen.backend@...edance.com, tianzichen@...ishou.com,
fannaihao@...du.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/20] cachefiles: notify user daemon with anon_fd when looking up cookie
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> + This permits on-demand read mode of cachefiles. In this mode, when
> + cache miss, the cachefiles backend instead of netfs, is responsible
> + for fetching data, e.g. through user daemon.
That third line should probably begin with a tab as the other two line do.
> +static inline void cachefiles_flush_reqs(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
If it's in a .c file, there's no need to mark it "inline". The compiler will
inline it anyway if it decides it should.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CACHEFILES_ONDEMAND
> + cachefiles_flush_reqs(cache);
> + xa_destroy(&cache->reqs);
> +#endif
If cachefiles_flush_reqs() is only used in this one place, the xa_destroy()
should possibly be moved into it.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists