[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cacb177f-20e2-b50a-806f-777837fba693@amd.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 19:37:34 -0500
From: "Gong, Richard" <richard.gong@....com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc: mario.limonciello@....com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com,
xinhui.pan@....com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] drm/amdgpu: disable ASPM on Intel AlderLake based
systems
On 4/8/2022 7:19 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Richard,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> Am 08.04.22 um 21:05 schrieb Richard Gong:
>> Active State Power Management (ASPM) feature is enabled since kernel
>> 5.14.
>> There are some AMD GFX cards (such as WX3200 and RX640) that cannot be
>> used with Intel AlderLake based systems to enable ASPM. Using these GFX
>
> Alder Lake
Actually there are 2 formats (one with space, another is w/o space) in
the upstream sources, so I will keep that unchanged and use the format
w/o space.
>
>> cards as video/display output, Intel Alder Lake based systems will hang
>> during suspend/resume.
>
> Please reflow for 75 characters per line.
>
> Also please mention the exact system you had problems with (also
> firmware versions).
>
>>
>> Add extra check to disable ASPM on Intel AlderLake based systems.
>
> Is that a problem with Intel Alder Lake or the Dell system? Shouldn’t
> ASPM just be disabled for the problematic cards for the Dell system.
> You write newer cards worked fine.
>
>> Fixes: 0064b0ce85bb ("drm/amd/pm: enable ASPM by default")
>> Link:
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Famd%2F-%2Fissues%2F1885&data=04%7C01%7Crichard.gong%40amd.com%7C6b94ff2249244c04974e08da19bea71b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637850604066094079%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2FiF%2Bnwzm5RlClT%2Fv%2B0RJvmVwsc%2FiwV3jCiFq7PB84wM%3D&reserved=0
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@....com>
>> ---
>> v2: correct commit description
>> move the check from chip family to problematic platform
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c
>> index 039b90cdc3bc..8b4eaf54b23e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c
>> @@ -81,6 +81,10 @@
>> #include "mxgpu_vi.h"
>> #include "amdgpu_dm.h"
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64)
>> +#include <asm/intel-family.h>
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #define ixPCIE_LC_L1_PM_SUBSTATE 0x100100C6
>> #define PCIE_LC_L1_PM_SUBSTATE__LC_L1_SUBSTATES_OVERRIDE_EN_MASK
>> 0x00000001L
>> #define PCIE_LC_L1_PM_SUBSTATE__LC_PCI_PM_L1_2_OVERRIDE_MASK
>> 0x00000002L
>> @@ -1134,13 +1138,24 @@ static void vi_enable_aspm(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>> WREG32_PCIE(ixPCIE_LC_CNTL, data);
>> }
>> +static bool intel_core_apsm_chk(void)
>
> aspm
>
>> +{
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64)
>> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
>> +
>> + return (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_ALDERLAKE);
>> +#else
>> + return false;
>> +#endif
>
> Please do the check in C code and not the preprocessor.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> static void vi_program_aspm(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> {
>> u32 data, data1, orig;
>> bool bL1SS = false;
>> bool bClkReqSupport = true;
>> - if (!amdgpu_device_should_use_aspm(adev))
>> + if (!amdgpu_device_should_use_aspm(adev) || intel_core_apsm_chk())
>> return;
>> if (adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU ||
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists