[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YlREKRb/xgAFsi97@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:07:21 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: tim@...erelk.net, axboe@...nel.dk, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: do not leak information in ioctl
Wrong subject prefix, and this really should be split into one patch for
pcd and one for sr.
The sr prt looks sensible to me. But for pcd why can't you just
initialize buffer using
char buffer[32] = { };
and be done with it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists