[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1ef20a1-6eda-2350-e5dc-bb32dcff8a1d@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:28:13 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@...wei.com>,
Pedro Gomes <pedrodemargomes@...il.com>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/16] mm/rmap: use page_move_anon_rmap() when reusing
a mapped PageAnon() page exclusively
On 12.04.22 11:26, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 3/29/22 18:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> We want to mark anonymous pages exclusive, and when using
>> page_move_anon_rmap() we know that we are the exclusive user, as
>> properly documented. This is a preparation for marking anonymous pages
>> exclusive in page_move_anon_rmap().
>>
>> In both instances, we're holding page lock and are sure that we're the
>> exclusive owner (page_count() == 1). hugetlb already properly uses
>> page_move_anon_rmap() in the write fault handler.
>
> Yeah, note that do_wp_page() used to call page_move_anon_rmap() always since
> the latter was introduced, until commit 09854ba94c6a ("mm: do_wp_page()
> simplification"). Probably not intended.
Yeah, it was buried underneath all that reuse_swap_page() complexity.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists