linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] wlcore: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 12:33:36 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wlcore: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

cgel.zte@...il.com writes:

> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>

Please try to make the patch titles unique, you have already submitted a
patch with the same name:

wlcore: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220408081205.2494512-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn/

I'll rename this patch to:

wlcore: main: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches