[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48939b53-ede5-103a-ceae-9d7b9dcc4a1b@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 11:46:00 +0300
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: <cgel.zte@...il.com>, <nm@...com>
CC: <ssantosh@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: knav_dma: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get
instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
On 12/04/2022 11:29, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c
> index 700d8eecd8c4..061f92c8cf7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c
> @@ -747,9 +747,8 @@ static int knav_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kdev->list);
>
> pm_runtime_enable(kdev->dev);
> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(kdev->dev);
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(kdev->dev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - pm_runtime_put_noidle(kdev->dev);
> dev_err(kdev->dev, "unable to enable pktdma, err %d\n", ret);
> goto err_pm_disable;
> }
Thank you.
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
--
Best regards,
Grygorii, Ukraine
Powered by blists - more mailing lists