[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220412083000.2532711-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 08:30:00 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: shengjiu.wang@...il.com
Cc: Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, festevam@...il.com, nicoleotsuka@...il.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
index ed444e8f1d6b..1a2bdf8e76f0 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
@@ -1050,11 +1050,9 @@ static int fsl_esai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_pm_disable;
}
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
goto err_pm_get_sync;
- }
ret = fsl_esai_hw_init(esai_priv);
if (ret)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists