[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512fce32b8967ebc49f6fc074db408c117b510f7.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 08:57:31 +0800
From: "ying.huang@...el.com" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: songmuchun@...edance.com, hch@...radead.org, willy@...radead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] mm/vmscan: save a bit of stack space in
shrink_lruvec
On Sat, 2022-04-09 at 17:34 +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> LRU_UNEVICTABLE is not taken into account when shrink lruvec. So we can
> save a bit of stack space by shrinking the array size of nr and targets
> to NR_LRU_LISTS - 1. No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 59b96320f481..0e5818970998 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2881,8 +2881,9 @@ static bool can_age_anon_pages(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>
>
> static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
> {
> - unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> - unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> + /* LRU_UNEVICTABLE is not taken into account. */
> + unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS - 1];
> + unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS - 1];
> unsigned long nr_to_scan;
> enum lru_list lru;
> unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
As Christoph pointed out, this is hacky without much benefit. Please
drop this patch.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists