[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220412111434.96498-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 19:14:32 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: corbet@....net, mike.kravetz@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mcgrof@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com,
osalvador@...e.de, david@...hat.com, masahiroy@...nel.org
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, duanxiongchun@...edance.com, smuchun@...il.com,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/4] mm: memory_hotplug: override memmap_on_memory when hugetlb_free_vmemmap=on
When "hugetlb_free_vmemmap=on" and "memory_hotplug.memmap_on_memory"
are both passed to boot cmdline, the variable of "memmap_on_memory"
will be set to 1 even if the vmemmap pages will not be allocated from
the hotadded memory since the former takes precedence over the latter.
In the next patch, we want to enable or disable the feature of freeing
vmemmap pages of HugeTLB via sysctl. We need a way to know if the
feature of memory_hotplug.memmap_on_memory is enabled when enabling
the feature of freeing vmemmap pages since those two features are not
compatible, however, the variable of "memmap_on_memory" cannot indicate
this nowadays. Do not set "memmap_on_memory" to 1 when both parameters
are passed to cmdline, in this case, "memmap_on_memory" could indicate
if this feature is enabled by the users.
Also introduce mhp_memmap_on_memory() helper to move the definition of
"memmap_on_memory" to the scope of CONFIG_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY. In the
next patch, mhp_memmap_on_memory() will also be exported to be used in
hugetlb_vmemmap.c.
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
---
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 74430f88853d..f6eab03397d3 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -42,14 +42,36 @@
#include "internal.h"
#include "shuffle.h"
+#ifdef CONFIG_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
+static int memmap_on_memory_set(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
+{
+ if (hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap_enabled())
+ return 0;
+ return param_set_bool(val, kp);
+}
+
+static const struct kernel_param_ops memmap_on_memory_ops = {
+ .flags = KERNEL_PARAM_OPS_FL_NOARG,
+ .set = memmap_on_memory_set,
+ .get = param_get_bool,
+};
/*
* memory_hotplug.memmap_on_memory parameter
*/
static bool memmap_on_memory __ro_after_init;
-#ifdef CONFIG_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
-module_param(memmap_on_memory, bool, 0444);
+module_param_cb(memmap_on_memory, &memmap_on_memory_ops, &memmap_on_memory, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(memmap_on_memory, "Enable memmap on memory for memory hotplug");
+
+static inline bool mhp_memmap_on_memory(void)
+{
+ return memmap_on_memory;
+}
+#else
+static inline bool mhp_memmap_on_memory(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
#endif
enum {
@@ -1272,9 +1294,7 @@ bool mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory(unsigned long size)
* altmap as an alternative source of memory, and we do not exactly
* populate a single PMD.
*/
- return memmap_on_memory &&
- !hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap_enabled() &&
- IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY) &&
+ return mhp_memmap_on_memory() &&
size == memory_block_size_bytes() &&
IS_ALIGNED(vmemmap_size, PMD_SIZE) &&
IS_ALIGNED(remaining_size, (pageblock_nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
@@ -2081,7 +2101,7 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
* We only support removing memory added with MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY in
* the same granularity it was added - a single memory block.
*/
- if (memmap_on_memory) {
+ if (mhp_memmap_on_memory()) {
nr_vmemmap_pages = walk_memory_blocks(start, size, NULL,
get_nr_vmemmap_pages_cb);
if (nr_vmemmap_pages) {
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists