[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc41bd1fba599acf937e73762ae196432f8c72bf.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 19:24:02 +0800
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com>,
<roger.lu@...iatek.com>, <hsinyi@...gle.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 12/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Use maximum voltage in init
stage
On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 15:37 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 08/04/22 06:59, Rex-BC Chen ha scritto:
> > From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com>
> >
> > Two or more clients may use the same regulator, and it could cause
> > the
> > issue of high-freqeuncy-low-voltage.
> > To prevent this, we use maximum voltage in
> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com>
>
> Is this happening for proc-supply (proc_reg)?
> ...because it looks like it is, so you should send this commit
> separately
> and with an appropriate Fixes: tag.
Hello Angelo,
The commit message is not clear.
The clients are cpufreq and mediatek cci.
I think there is no any error before introducing mediatek cci into
cpufreq.
The order of this patch should be after "cpufreq: mediatek: Link CCI
device to CPU".
If so, I will also correct the commit message in next version.
BRs,
Rex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists