lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff4426d8-c76e-dd9b-96b9-fc35eede00c4@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:08:16 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 04/12] iommu/sva: Basic data structures for SVA

On 2022/4/12 14:56, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2022 6:25 PM
>>
>> Use below data structures for SVA implementation in the IOMMU core:
>>
>> - struct iommu_sva_ioas
>>    Represent the I/O address space shared with an application CPU address
>>    space. This structure has a 1:1 relationship with an mm_struct. It
>>    graps a "mm->mm_count" refcount during creation and drop it on release.
> 
> s/graps/grabs

Thanks!

> 
>>
>> - struct iommu_domain (IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA type)
>>    Represent a hardware pagetable that the IOMMU hardware could use for
>>    SVA translation. Multiple iommu domains could be bound with an SVA ioas
>>    and each graps a refcount from ioas in order to make sure ioas could
>>    only be freed after all domains have been unbound.
>>
>> - struct iommu_sva
>>    Represent a bond relationship between an SVA ioas and an iommu domain.
>>    If a bond already exists, it's reused and a reference is taken.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> btw given the actually intention of above structures does it make more
> sense to s/iommu_sva_ioas/iommu_sva/ and s/iommu_sva/iommu_sva_bond?

The use of iommu_sva has been scattered in external files as it's the
return type or parameter of the the iommu sva intefaces:

$ git grep "struct iommu_sva" :^drivers/iommu :^include/linux
drivers/dma/idxd/cdev.c:        struct iommu_sva *sva;
drivers/dma/idxd/cdev.c:        struct iommu_sva *sva;
drivers/dma/idxd/idxd.h:        struct iommu_sva *sva;
drivers/dma/idxd/init.c:        struct iommu_sva *sva;
drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c:     struct iommu_sva *handle;

Your suggestion makes sense to me as I've also thought about it. :-)
It might be easier to arrive there through a separated cleanup series.

Best regards,
baolu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ