[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16750a7d-de4b-0bba-9513-c45560d279ba@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:19:37 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@...esas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@...tor.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Simplify single/double data
register access
On 12/04/2022 12:17, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> But that's not what happened. I even compared the assembler output of
>> various solutions.
>
> I am sure you did. I just said "it looks like..." to state a reason why
> I don't think it looks prettier. But this turns to bike-shedding for me,
> just keep it if everyone else is happy.
I vote for removal of ++, because later someone might wonder why it was
incremented even if not used.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists