linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Simplify single/double data register access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:19:37 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        Duc Nguyen <duc.nguyen.ub@...esas.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@...tor.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Simplify single/double data
 register access

On 12/04/2022 12:17, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> But that's not what happened. I even compared the assembler output of
>> various solutions.
> 
> I am sure you did. I just said "it looks like..." to state a reason why
> I don't think it looks prettier. But this turns to bike-shedding for me,
> just keep it if everyone else is happy.

I vote for removal of ++, because later someone might wonder why it was
incremented even if not used.

Best regards,
Krzysztof