[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyAFQLgGM-Lxn_DWeQWYuy+42hC7wtxSG3tFHE0brJJqPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 21:00:12 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/sev: The code for returning to user space is also
in syscall gap
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 5:51 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> + Tom and leaving the whole mail un-trimmed for him.
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:22:15PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > When returning to user space, the %rsp is user controlled value.
>
> And?
>
> I'd expect to see here some text analyzing the couple of instructions
> between those new labels you've added and whether a #VC can happen
> there.
Hello, Borislav
I resent the patch with an updated changelog mainly copied from
Joerg's reply.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220412124909.10467-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com/
The other two patches in this patchset are omitted since they
make less sense which only harms only when the system owner
is deliberately doing stupid things.
thanks
Lai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists