linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8524: remove rate constraint for FE-BE case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YlV8/dJeyFFDf/v/@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:22:05 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
Cc:     Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8524: remove rate constraint for FE-BE case

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 09:18:16PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 8:39 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > nor is having to open code it into the driver.  I already had it in the
> > back of my head to generalise the set constraints based on sysclk
> > pattern into the core, that might be productive here.

> I also hesitate to add this in the codec driver. I agree that it is better
> to be put in the core.

> When will you have a patch for this?

Dunno, no fixed plans - it partly depends on how gummed up other stuff
I'm doing is waiting for review.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)