[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a8e21fb-d8bf-5428-67e5-41c47529e641@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 21:46:44 +0800
From: "chenxiaosong (A)" <chenxiaosong2@...wei.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>,
"anna@...nel.org" <anna@...nel.org>,
"smayhew@...hat.com" <smayhew@...hat.com>
CC: "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"liuyongqiang13@...wei.com" <liuyongqiang13@...wei.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yi.zhang@...wei.com" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
"zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com" <zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com>,
<smayhew@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] nfs: nfs{,4}_file_flush should consume
writeback error
在 2022/3/6 23:08, Trond Myklebust 写道:
>
> Just to clarify a little.
>
> I don't see a need to consume the writeback errors on close(), unless
> other filesystems do the same. If the intention is that fsync() should
> see _all_ errors that haven't already been seen, then NFS should follow
> the same semantics as all the other filesystems.
>
Other filesystem will _not_ clear writeback error on close().
And other filesystem will _not_ clear writeback error on async write() too.
Other filesystem _only_ clear writeback error on fsync() or sync write().
Should NFS follow the same semantics as all the other filesystems?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists