lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220412151529.GF3293@kadam>
Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:15:29 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
        Vihas Makwana <makvihas@...il.com>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] drop some unnecessary wrappers

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:53:42AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> I didn't suggest a re-write of the commit messages.

Yes.  That's the problem.  If you want to complain about a commit
message then you *should* suggest how you would re-write it.  Otherwise
how are we supposed to read your mind?

> I just pointed out that those messages are formally inaccurate but
> that these kinds of small formal inaccuracies

I'm so puzzled but what you mean here.  There were no "small formal
inaccuracies".  The patch removed unnecessary wrappers exactly as
described.  Anyway, I haven't seen your proposed commit message so I
can't say.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ