| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <eeda0d14-270a-971a-900d-8b55a1f020c8@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:18:30 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
farman@...ux.ibm.com, pmorel@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, vneethv@...ux.ibm.com,
oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/21] s390/pci: stash associated GISA designation
Am 05.04.22 um 10:03 schrieb Niklas Schnelle:
> On Mon, 2022-04-04 at 13:43 -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> For passthrough devices, we will need to know the GISA designation of the
>> guest if interpretation facilities are to be used. Setup to stash this in
>> the zdev and set a default of 0 (no GISA designation) for now; a subsequent
>> patch will set a valid GISA designation for passthrough devices.
>> Also, extend mpcific routines to specify this stashed designation as part
>> of the mpcific command.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h | 1 +
>> arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h | 3 ++-
>> arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 6 ++++++
>> arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c | 5 +++++
>> arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c | 5 +++++
>> 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
>> index fdb9745ee998..42a4a312a6dd 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
>> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ struct zpci_dev {
>> enum zpci_state state;
>> u32 fid; /* function ID, used by sclp */
>> u32 fh; /* function handle, used by insn's */
>> + u32 gisa; /* GISA designation for passthrough */
>> u16 vfn; /* virtual function number */
>> u16 pchid; /* physical channel ID */
>> u8 pfgid; /* function group ID */
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h
>> index 1f4b666e85ee..f3286bc5ba6e 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h
>> @@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ struct clp_req_set_pci {
>> u16 reserved2;
>> u8 oc; /* operation controls */
>> u8 ndas; /* number of dma spaces */
>> - u64 reserved3;
>> + u32 reserved3;
>> + u32 gisa; /* GISA designation */
>> } __packed;
>>
>> /* Set PCI function response */
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
>> index e563cb65c0c4..a86cd1cbb80e 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ int zpci_register_ioat(struct zpci_dev *zdev, u8 dmaas,
>> fib.pba = base;
>> fib.pal = limit;
>> fib.iota = iota | ZPCI_IOTA_RTTO_FLAG;
>> + fib.gd = zdev->gisa;
>> cc = zpci_mod_fc(req, &fib, &status);
>> if (cc)
>> zpci_dbg(3, "reg ioat fid:%x, cc:%d, status:%d\n", zdev->fid, cc, status);
>> @@ -133,6 +134,8 @@ int zpci_unregister_ioat(struct zpci_dev *zdev, u8 dmaas)
>> struct zpci_fib fib = {0};
>> u8 cc, status;
>>
>> + fib.gd = zdev->gisa;
>
> This could go into the initializer which becomes:
>
> struct zpci_fib fib = {.gd = zdev->gisa};
>
>> +
>> cc = zpci_mod_fc(req, &fib, &status);
>> if (cc)
>> zpci_dbg(3, "unreg ioat fid:%x, cc:%d, status:%d\n", zdev->fid, cc, status);
>> @@ -160,6 +163,7 @@ int zpci_fmb_enable_device(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
>> atomic64_set(&zdev->unmapped_pages, 0);
>>
>> fib.fmb_addr = virt_to_phys(zdev->fmb);
>> + fib.gd = zdev->gisa;
>> cc = zpci_mod_fc(req, &fib, &status);
>> if (cc) {
>> kmem_cache_free(zdev_fmb_cache, zdev->fmb);
>> @@ -178,6 +182,8 @@ int zpci_fmb_disable_device(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
>> if (!zdev->fmb)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> + fib.gd = zdev->gisa;
>> +
>> /* Function measurement is disabled if fmb address is zero */
>> cc = zpci_mod_fc(req, &fib, &status);
>> if (cc == 3) /* Function already gone. */
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c
>> index 1057d7af4a55..deed35edea14 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c
>> @@ -229,12 +229,16 @@ static int clp_set_pci_fn(struct zpci_dev *zdev, u32 *fh, u8 nr_dma_as, u8 comma
>> {
>> struct clp_req_rsp_set_pci *rrb;
>> int rc, retries = 100;
>> + u32 gisa = 0;
>>
>> *fh = 0;
>> rrb = clp_alloc_block(GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!rrb)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + if (command != CLP_SET_DISABLE_PCI_FN)
>> + gisa = zdev->gisa;
>> +
>> do {
>> memset(rrb, 0, sizeof(*rrb));
>> rrb->request.hdr.len = sizeof(rrb->request);
>> @@ -243,6 +247,7 @@ static int clp_set_pci_fn(struct zpci_dev *zdev, u32 *fh, u8 nr_dma_as, u8 comma
>> rrb->request.fh = zdev->fh;
>> rrb->request.oc = command;
>> rrb->request.ndas = nr_dma_as;
>> + rrb->request.gisa = gisa;
>>
>> rc = clp_req(rrb, CLP_LPS_PCI);
>> if (rrb->response.hdr.rsp == CLP_RC_SETPCIFN_BUSY) {
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
>> index f2b3145b6697..a2b42a63a53b 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static int zpci_set_airq(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
>> fib.fmt0.aibvo = 0; /* each zdev has its own interrupt vector */
>> fib.fmt0.aisb = virt_to_phys(zpci_sbv->vector) + (zdev->aisb / 64) * 8;
>> fib.fmt0.aisbo = zdev->aisb & 63;
>> + fib.gd = zdev->gisa;
>>
>> return zpci_mod_fc(req, &fib, &status) ? -EIO : 0;
>> }
>> @@ -54,6 +55,8 @@ static int zpci_clear_airq(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
>> struct zpci_fib fib = {0};
>> u8 cc, status;
>>
>> + fib.gd = zdev->gisa;
>> +
>
> Same as in zpci_register_ioat()
>
>> cc = zpci_mod_fc(req, &fib, &status);
>> if (cc == 3 || (cc == 1 && status == 24))
>> /* Function already gone or IRQs already deregistered. */
>> @@ -72,6 +75,7 @@ static int zpci_set_directed_irq(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
>> fib.fmt = 1;
>> fib.fmt1.noi = zdev->msi_nr_irqs;
>> fib.fmt1.dibvo = zdev->msi_first_bit;
>> + fib.gd = zdev->gisa;
>>
>> return zpci_mod_fc(req, &fib, &status) ? -EIO : 0;
>> }
>> @@ -84,6 +88,7 @@ static int zpci_clear_directed_irq(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
>> u8 cc, status;
>>
>> fib.fmt = 1;
>> + fib.gd = zdev->gisa;
>> cc = zpci_mod_fc(req, &fib, &status);
>> if (cc == 3 || (cc == 1 && status == 24))
>> /* Function already gone or IRQs already deregistered. */
>
> Looks good with or without using an initializer:
> Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists