[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <021ece97-5e62-c07f-bb6d-b69c93d73b31@wanyeetech.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:45:29 +0800
From: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, hminas@...opsys.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dongsheng.qiu@...enic.com, aric.pzqi@...enic.com,
rick.tyliu@...enic.com, sihui.liu@...enic.com,
jun.jiang@...enic.com, sernia.zhou@...mail.com,
Dragan Čečavac <dragancecavac@...oo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] USB: dwc2: Add OTG support for Ingenic SoCs.
Hi Felipe,
On 2021/7/24 下午9:24, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi Zhou,
>
> Zhou Yanjie writes:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c
>>>> index 67c5eb1..a7a1b50 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c
>>>> @@ -71,6 +71,47 @@ static void dwc2_set_his_params(struct
>>>> dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
>>>> p->power_down = DWC2_POWER_DOWN_PARAM_NONE;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void dwc2_set_jz4775_params(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dwc2_core_params *p = &hsotg->params;
>>>> +
>>>> + p->otg_cap = DWC2_CAP_PARAM_NO_HNP_SRP_CAPABLE;
>>>> + p->speed = DWC2_SPEED_PARAM_HIGH;
>>>> + p->phy_type = DWC2_PHY_TYPE_PARAM_UTMI;
>>>> + p->phy_utmi_width = 16;
>>>> + p->deactivate_ingenic_overcurrent_detection =
>>>> + device_property_read_bool(hsotg->dev, "disable-over-current");
>>> That device property was not documented in the previous patch. Also
>>> this probably should be "ingenic,disable-over-current".
>>>
>> This device property already exists (it has been used in the
>> "dwc2_get_device_properties()" function below).
>>
>> Under normal circumstances, after using this device attribute, it
>> should be possible to turn off the overcurrent
>>
>> detection, but on the Ingenic processors, somehow it did not take
>> effect normally, and we must operate the
>>
>> "VBVALOEN" bit and "VBVALOVAL" bit of "GOTGCTL" register to make it normal.
> I believe what Paul is suggesting is that this property lacks
> documentation under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/. If that's the
> case, you could take the opportunity to document the property and,
> perhaps, add the missing prefix.
Sorry for the long time delay.
Looks like Krzysztof has done the job, I will send v2 soon.
Thanks and best regards!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists