[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <027acae3-29ee-ae35-4448-a56e66383849@lwfinger.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 12:18:50 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Mahak Gupta <mahak_g@...iitr.ac.in>, phil@...lpotter.co.uk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: correct multiple misspellings in driver
r8188eu
On 4/11/22 16:28, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Subject:
>
> staging: r8188eu: fix multiple spelling errors in driver source
>
> Given that it already annotated that it's the r8188eu driver, no need to add "in
> driver r8188eu".
>
> Maybe the log can be something less terse:
>
> Fix multiple spelling errors reported by checkpatch.
>
>
> Probably doesn't hurt to fix other issues on the same line while you are at it.
> See below...
Wrong on the first and last points. That subject is exactly what should be used
- it describes what is being modified.
A given patch should fix one, and only one, problem.
Yes, the commit message could be less terse, but that is not a problem.
Larry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists