linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow detecting ACP6x DMIC via

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:38:13 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, mario.limonciello@....com
Cc:     Vijendar.Mukunda@....com, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow detecting ACP6x DMIC via _DSD

On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:45:30 -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> It's not possible to probe for the presence of a DMIC, so the ACP6x
> machine driver currently has a hardcoded list of all the systems known
> to have a DMIC connected to the ACP.
> 
> Although this design works it means that the acp6x driver needs to always
> grow with more systems and worse, if an OEM introduces a new system there
> will be a mismatch in time that even if the driver (otherwise) works fine
> it needs their system added to the list to work.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: amd: Add driver data to acp6x machine driver
      commit: e521f087780d07731e8c950f2f34d08358c86bc9
[2/2] ASoC: amd: Add support for enabling DMIC on acp6x via _DSD
      commit: 5426f506b58424f8ab2cd741bacf4b18b5fe578e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark