linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 086/171] NFS: swap-out must always use STABLE writes.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220412062930.376791831@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 08:29:37 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 086/171] NFS: swap-out must always use STABLE writes.

From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>

[ Upstream commit c265de257f558a05c1859ee9e3fed04883b9ec0e ]

The commit handling code is not safe against memory-pressure deadlocks
when writing to swap.  In particular, nfs_commitdata_alloc() blocks
indefinitely waiting for memory, and this can consume all available
workqueue threads.

swap-out most likely uses STABLE writes anyway as COND_STABLE indicates
that a stable write should be used if the write fits in a single
request, and it normally does.  However if we ever swap with a small
wsize, or gather unusually large numbers of pages for a single write,
this might change.

For safety, make it explicit in the code that direct writes used for swap
must always use FLUSH_STABLE.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/nfs/direct.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
index 28afc315ec0c..c220810c61d1 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ static const struct nfs_pgio_completion_ops nfs_direct_write_completion_ops = {
  */
 static ssize_t nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
 					       struct iov_iter *iter,
-					       loff_t pos)
+					       loff_t pos, int ioflags)
 {
 	struct nfs_pageio_descriptor desc;
 	struct inode *inode = dreq->inode;
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
 	size_t requested_bytes = 0;
 	size_t wsize = max_t(size_t, NFS_SERVER(inode)->wsize, PAGE_SIZE);
 
-	nfs_pageio_init_write(&desc, inode, FLUSH_COND_STABLE, false,
+	nfs_pageio_init_write(&desc, inode, ioflags, false,
 			      &nfs_direct_write_completion_ops);
 	desc.pg_dreq = dreq;
 	get_dreq(dreq);
@@ -947,11 +947,13 @@ ssize_t nfs_file_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
 	pnfs_init_ds_commit_info_ops(&dreq->ds_cinfo, inode);
 
 	if (swap) {
-		requested = nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(dreq, iter, pos);
+		requested = nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(dreq, iter, pos,
+							    FLUSH_STABLE);
 	} else {
 		nfs_start_io_direct(inode);
 
-		requested = nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(dreq, iter, pos);
+		requested = nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(dreq, iter, pos,
+							    FLUSH_COND_STABLE);
 
 		if (mapping->nrpages) {
 			invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
-- 
2.35.1