linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 132/277] x86: Annotate call_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 08:28:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 132/277] x86: Annotate call_on_stack()

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

[ Upstream commit be0075951fde739f14ee2b659e2fd6e2499c46c0 ]

vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: page_fault_oops()+0x13c: unreachable instruction

0000 000000000005b460 <page_fault_oops>:
...
0128    5b588:  49 89 23                mov    %rsp,(%r11)
012b    5b58b:  4c 89 dc                mov    %r11,%rsp
012e    5b58e:  4c 89 f2                mov    %r14,%rdx
0131    5b591:  48 89 ee                mov    %rbp,%rsi
0134    5b594:  4c 89 e7                mov    %r12,%rdi
0137    5b597:  e8 00 00 00 00          call   5b59c <page_fault_oops+0x13c>    5b598: R_X86_64_PLT32   handle_stack_overflow-0x4
013c    5b59c:  5c                      pop    %rsp

vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: sysvec_reboot()+0x6d: unreachable instruction

0000 00000000000033f0 <sysvec_reboot>:
...
005d     344d:  4c 89 dc                mov    %r11,%rsp
0060     3450:  e8 00 00 00 00          call   3455 <sysvec_reboot+0x65>        3451: R_X86_64_PLT32    irq_enter_rcu-0x4
0065     3455:  48 89 ef                mov    %rbp,%rdi
0068     3458:  e8 00 00 00 00          call   345d <sysvec_reboot+0x6d>        3459: R_X86_64_PC32     .text+0x47d0c
006d     345d:  e8 00 00 00 00          call   3462 <sysvec_reboot+0x72>        345e: R_X86_64_PLT32    irq_exit_rcu-0x4
0072     3462:  5c                      pop    %rsp

Both cases are due to a call_on_stack() calling a __noreturn function.
Since that's an inline asm, GCC can't do anything about the
instructions after the CALL. Therefore put in an explicit
ASM_REACHABLE annotation to make sure objtool and gcc are consistently
confused about control flow.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308154319.468805622@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h
index 8d55bd11848c..e087cd7837c3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h
@@ -99,7 +99,8 @@
 }
 
 #define ASM_CALL_ARG0							\
-	"call %P[__func]				\n"
+	"call %P[__func]				\n"		\
+	ASM_REACHABLE
 
 #define ASM_CALL_ARG1							\
 	"movq	%[arg1], %%rdi				\n"		\
-- 
2.35.1