[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YlcUMNe5gDsEca4f@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:19:28 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] device property: Constify fwnode_handle_get()
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 08:10:22PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 8:49 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
...
> > -struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_handle_get(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_handle_get(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > {
> > if (!fwnode_has_op(fwnode, get))
> > return fwnode;
^^^^, so it needs a casting, but then we have to comment why is so.
> Why is 0-day complaining about this one?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists