lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <78cd352296ceb14da1d0136ff7d0a6818e594ab7.1649877511.git.andreyknvl@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:26:45 +0200
From:   andrey.konovalov@...ux.dev
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        Florian Mayer <fmayer@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] kasan, arm64: implement stack_trace_save_shadow

From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>

Implement stack_trace_save_shadow() that collects stack traces based on
the Shadow Call Stack (SCS) for arm64 by copiing the frames from SCS.

The implementation is best-effort and thus has limitations.

stack_trace_save_shadow() fully handles task and softirq contexts, which
are both processed on the per-task SCS.

For hardirqs, the support is limited: stack_trace_save_shadow() does not
collect the task part of the stack trace. For KASAN, this is not a problem,
as stack depot only saves the interrupt part of the stack anyway.

Otherwise, stack_trace_save_shadow() also takes a best-effort approach
with a focus on performance. Thus, it:

- Does not try to collect stack traces from other exceptions like SDEI.
- Does not try to recover frames modified by KRETPROBES or by FTRACE.

However, stack_trace_save_shadow() does strip PTR_AUTH tags to avoid
leaking them in stack traces.

The -ENOSYS return value is deliberatly used to match
stack_trace_save_tsk_reliable().

Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
---
 mm/kasan/common.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
index d9079ec11f31..23b30fa6e270 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/common.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
@@ -30,6 +30,68 @@
 #include "kasan.h"
 #include "../slab.h"
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
+#include <linux/scs.h>
+#include <asm/scs.h>
+
+/*
+ * Collect the stack trace from the Shadow Call Stack in a best-effort manner:
+ *
+ * - Do not collect the task part of the stack trace when in a hardirq.
+ * - Do not collect stack traces from other exception levels like SDEI.
+ * - Do not recover frames modified by KRETPROBES or by FTRACE.
+ *
+ * Note that marking the function with __noscs leads to unnacceptable
+ * performance impact, as helper functions stop being inlined.
+ */
+static inline int stack_trace_save_shadow(unsigned long *store,
+					  unsigned int size)
+{
+	unsigned long *scs_top, *scs_base, *frame;
+	unsigned int len = 0;
+
+	/* Get the SCS base. */
+	if (in_task() || in_serving_softirq()) {
+		/* Softirqs reuse the task SCS area. */
+		scs_base = task_scs(current);
+	} else if (in_hardirq()) {
+		/* Hardirqs use a per-CPU SCS area. */
+		scs_base = *this_cpu_ptr(&irq_shadow_call_stack_ptr);
+	} else {
+		/* Ignore other exception levels. */
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Get the SCS pointer.
+	 *
+	 * Note that this assembly might be placed before the function's
+	 * prologue. In this case, the last stack frame will be lost. This is
+	 * acceptable: the lost frame will correspond to an internal KASAN
+	 * function, which is not relevant to identify the external call site.
+	 */
+	asm volatile("mov %0, x18" : "=&r" (scs_top));
+
+	/* The top SCS slot is empty. */
+	scs_top -= 1;
+
+	for (frame = scs_top; frame >= scs_base; frame--) {
+		if (len >= size)
+			break;
+		/* Do not leak PTR_AUTH tags in stack traces. */
+		store[len++] = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(*frame);
+	}
+
+	return len;
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK */
+static inline int stack_trace_save_shadow(unsigned long *store,
+					  unsigned int size)
+{
+	return -ENOSYS;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK */
+
 depot_stack_handle_t kasan_save_stack(gfp_t flags, bool can_alloc)
 {
 	unsigned long entries[KASAN_STACK_DEPTH];
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ