linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] interconnect: qcom: sc7180: Drop IP0 interconnects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d80ece40-fdd7-f304-3989-47ae152d5ac9@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:02:00 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] interconnect: qcom: sc7180: Drop IP0 interconnects

On 4/13/22 3:55 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:20 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>>
>> @@ -519,8 +500,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id qnoc_of_match[] = {
>>            .data = &sc7180_dc_noc},
>>          { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-gem-noc",
>>            .data = &sc7180_gem_noc},
>> -       { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-ipa-virt",
>> -         .data = &sc7180_ipa_virt},
>>          { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mc-virt",
>>            .data = &sc7180_mc_virt},
>>          { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mmss-noc",
> 
> I have no objection to ${SUBJECT} change landing and based on all your
> research and Alex's review/testing I think it's good to go.
> 
> However, now that you're removed the driver that cared about
> "qcom,sc7180-ipa-virt", should we also be removing it from the
> `bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml` file and the `sc7180.dtsi`
> file? I think that removing it from _either_ the driver (like your
> patch here does) _or_ the sc7180.dtsi file would fix the bug, right?
> ...and then removing it from the yaml would just be cleanup...

That's a good point, I hadn't thought about that but you're right.

I think we were too pleased about identifying the problem and
proving it could happen (and cause a crash), so we didn't think
hard enough about this other piece.

Stephen, I think you should re-spin the series and add the
proper change to the binding.  You can keep the tags I gave
before.

I've got a note to follow up with similar changes to other
platforms where the interconnect driver includes resource "IP0"
and will plan to do what Doug suggests there too.

					-Alex

> -Doug