[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyBNK=t1M2QQBq2qea4gW3yqvqKNG0QX=HRvjM=eHY6w6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 12:13:27 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 2/4] KVM: X86: Introduce role.glevel for level
expanded pagetable
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 5:31 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> > union kvm_mmu_page_role {
> > u32 word;
> > @@ -331,7 +331,8 @@ union kvm_mmu_page_role {
> > unsigned smap_andnot_wp:1;
> > unsigned ad_disabled:1;
> > unsigned guest_mode:1;
> > - unsigned :6;
> > + unsigned glevel:4;
>
> We don't need 4 bits for this. Crossing our fingers that we never had to shadow
> a 2-level guest with a 6-level host, we can do:
>
> unsigned passthrough_delta:2;
We can save the bits in the future when we need more bits so I didn't
hesitate to use 4 bits since glevel gives simple code. ^_^
I think the name passthrough_delta is more informative and glevel
is used only for comparison so passthrough_delta can also be
simple. I will apply your suggestion.
Thanks
Lai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists