lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b511a483-4260-656a-ab04-2ba319e65ca7@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 23:36:15 +0000
From:   Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC:     david <david@...morbit.com>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
        "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] mce: fix set_mce_nospec to always unmap the whole
 page

On 4/11/2022 4:27 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 12:48 PM Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> The set_memory_uc() approach doesn't work well in all cases.
>> For example, when "The VMM unmapped the bad page from guest
>> physical space and passed the machine check to the guest."
>> "The guest gets virtual #MC on an access to that page.
>>   When the guest tries to do set_memory_uc() and instructs
>>   cpa_flush() to do clean caches that results in taking another
>>   fault / exception perhaps because the VMM unmapped the page
>>   from the guest."
>>
>> Since the driver has special knowledge to handle NP or UC,
> 
> I think a patch is needed before this one to make this statement true? I.e.:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/mce.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/mce.c
> index ee8d9973f60b..11641f55025a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/mce.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/mce.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static int nfit_handle_mce(struct notifier_block
> *nb, unsigned long val,
>           */
>          mutex_lock(&acpi_desc_lock);
>          list_for_each_entry(acpi_desc, &acpi_descs, list) {
> +               unsigned int align = 1UL << MCI_MISC_ADDR_LSB(mce->misc);
>                  struct device *dev = acpi_desc->dev;
>                  int found_match = 0;
> 
> @@ -63,8 +64,7 @@ static int nfit_handle_mce(struct notifier_block
> *nb, unsigned long val,
> 
>                  /* If this fails due to an -ENOMEM, there is little we can do */
>                  nvdimm_bus_add_badrange(acpi_desc->nvdimm_bus,
> -                               ALIGN(mce->addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES),
> -                               L1_CACHE_BYTES);
> +                                       ALIGN(mce->addr, align), align);
>                  nvdimm_region_notify(nfit_spa->nd_region,
>                                  NVDIMM_REVALIDATE_POISON);
> 

Dan, I tried the above change, and this is what I got after injecting 8 
back-to-back poisons, then read them and received  SIGBUS/BUS_MCEERR_AR, 
then repair via the v7 patch which works until this change is added.

[ 6240.955331] nfit ACPI0012:00: XXX, align = 100
[ 6240.960300] nfit ACPI0012:00: XXX, ALIGN(mce->addr, 
L1_CACHE_BYTES)=1851600400, L1_CACHE_BYTES=40, ALIGN(mce->addr, 
align)=1851600400
[..]
[ 6242.052277] nfit ACPI0012:00: XXX, align = 100
[ 6242.057243] nfit ACPI0012:00: XXX, ALIGN(mce->addr, 
L1_CACHE_BYTES)=1851601000, L1_CACHE_BYTES=40, ALIGN(mce->addr, 
align)=1851601000
[..]
[ 6244.917198] nfit ACPI0012:00: XXX, align = 1000
[ 6244.922258] nfit ACPI0012:00: XXX, ALIGN(mce->addr, 
L1_CACHE_BYTES)=1851601200, L1_CACHE_BYTES=40, ALIGN(mce->addr, 
align)=1851602000
[..]

All 8 poisons remain uncleared.

Without further investigation, I don't know why the failure.
Could we mark this change to a follow-on task?
The driver knows a lot about how to clear poisons besides hardcoding 
poison alignment to 0x40 bytes.

> 
>> let's mark the poisoned page with NP and let driver handle it
>> when it comes down to repair.
>>
>> Please refer to discussions here for more details.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAPcyv4hrXPb1tASBZUg-GgdVs0OOFKXMXLiHmktg_kFi7YBMyQ@mail.gmail.com/
>>
>> Now since poisoned page is marked as not-present, in order to
>> avoid writing to a 'np' page and trigger kernel Oops, also fix
>> pmem_do_write().
>>
>> Fixes: 284ce4011ba6 ("x86/memory_failure: Introduce {set, clear}_mce_nospec()")
>> Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c |  6 +++---
>>   arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c   | 18 ++++++------------
>>   drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c          | 31 +++++++------------------------
>>   include/linux/set_memory.h     |  4 ++--
>>   4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
>> index 981496e6bc0e..fa67bb9d1afe 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
>> @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int uc_decode_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>>
>>          pfn = mce->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>          if (!memory_failure(pfn, 0)) {
>> -               set_mce_nospec(pfn, whole_page(mce));
>> +               set_mce_nospec(pfn);
>>                  mce->kflags |= MCE_HANDLED_UC;
>>          }
>>
>> @@ -1316,7 +1316,7 @@ static void kill_me_maybe(struct callback_head *cb)
>>
>>          ret = memory_failure(p->mce_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, flags);
>>          if (!ret) {
>> -               set_mce_nospec(p->mce_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, p->mce_whole_page);
>> +               set_mce_nospec(p->mce_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>>                  sync_core();
>>                  return;
>>          }
>> @@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ static void kill_me_never(struct callback_head *cb)
>>          p->mce_count = 0;
>>          pr_err("Kernel accessed poison in user space at %llx\n", p->mce_addr);
>>          if (!memory_failure(p->mce_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0))
>> -               set_mce_nospec(p->mce_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, p->mce_whole_page);
>> +               set_mce_nospec(p->mce_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>>   }
>>
>>   static void queue_task_work(struct mce *m, char *msg, void (*func)(struct callback_head *))
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
>> index 93dde949f224..404ffcb3f2cb 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
>> @@ -1926,13 +1926,8 @@ int set_memory_wb(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_memory_wb);
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> -/*
>> - * Prevent speculative access to the page by either unmapping
>> - * it (if we do not require access to any part of the page) or
>> - * marking it uncacheable (if we want to try to retrieve data
>> - * from non-poisoned lines in the page).
>> - */
>> -int set_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn, bool unmap)
>> +/* Prevent speculative access to a page by marking it not-present */
>> +int set_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn)
>>   {
>>          unsigned long decoy_addr;
>>          int rc;
>> @@ -1954,10 +1949,7 @@ int set_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn, bool unmap)
>>           */
>>          decoy_addr = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + (PAGE_OFFSET ^ BIT(63));
>>
>> -       if (unmap)
>> -               rc = set_memory_np(decoy_addr, 1);
>> -       else
>> -               rc = set_memory_uc(decoy_addr, 1);
>> +       rc = set_memory_np(decoy_addr, 1);
>>          if (rc)
>>                  pr_warn("Could not invalidate pfn=0x%lx from 1:1 map\n", pfn);
>>          return rc;
>> @@ -1966,7 +1958,9 @@ int set_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn, bool unmap)
>>   /* Restore full speculative operation to the pfn. */
>>   int clear_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn)
>>   {
>> -       return set_memory_wb((unsigned long) pfn_to_kaddr(pfn), 1);
>> +       unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) pfn_to_kaddr(pfn);
>> +
>> +       return change_page_attr_set(&addr, 1, __pgprot(_PAGE_PRESENT), 0);
> 
> This probably warrants a set_memory_present() helper.

I had a set_memory_present() helper in an earlier version, but as there 
is no other caller, also if I'm not mis-remembering, thought Christoph 
had suggested to simplify the code and I agreed.  If you feel strong 
about adding the helper back, I can do that to improve readibility.

> 
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clear_mce_nospec);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
>> index 58d95242a836..30c71a68175b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
>> @@ -158,36 +158,19 @@ static blk_status_t pmem_do_write(struct pmem_device *pmem,
>>                          struct page *page, unsigned int page_off,
>>                          sector_t sector, unsigned int len)
>>   {
>> -       blk_status_t rc = BLK_STS_OK;
>> -       bool bad_pmem = false;
>>          phys_addr_t pmem_off = sector * 512 + pmem->data_offset;
>>          void *pmem_addr = pmem->virt_addr + pmem_off;
>>
>> -       if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, sector, len)))
>> -               bad_pmem = true;
>> +       if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, sector, len))) {
>> +               blk_status_t rc = pmem_clear_poison(pmem, pmem_off, len);
>>
>> -       /*
>> -        * Note that we write the data both before and after
>> -        * clearing poison.  The write before clear poison
>> -        * handles situations where the latest written data is
>> -        * preserved and the clear poison operation simply marks
>> -        * the address range as valid without changing the data.
>> -        * In this case application software can assume that an
>> -        * interrupted write will either return the new good
>> -        * data or an error.
>> -        *
>> -        * However, if pmem_clear_poison() leaves the data in an
>> -        * indeterminate state we need to perform the write
>> -        * after clear poison.
>> -        */
>> +               if (rc != BLK_STS_OK)
>> +                       pr_warn_ratelimited("%s: failed to clear poison\n", __func__);
> 
> This should be either "dev_warn_ratelimited(to_dev(pmem), ...", or a
> trace point similar to trace_block_rq_complete() that tells userspace
> about adverse I/O completion results.
> 
> However, that's probably a discussion for another patch, so I would
> just drop this new addition for now and we can discuss the logging in
> a follow-on patch.

Okay, drop the warning message.  If the unexpected pathological scenario 
happens, user will see I/O failure.

> 
> 
>> +                       return rc;
>> +       }
>>          flush_dcache_page(page);
>>          write_pmem(pmem_addr, page, page_off, len);
>> -       if (unlikely(bad_pmem)) {
>> -               rc = pmem_clear_poison(pmem, pmem_off, len);
>> -               write_pmem(pmem_addr, page, page_off, len);
>> -       }
>> -
>> -       return rc;
>> +       return BLK_STS_OK;
>>   }
>>
>>   static void pmem_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/set_memory.h b/include/linux/set_memory.h
>> index d6263d7afb55..cde2d8687a7b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/set_memory.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/set_memory.h
>> @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ static inline bool can_set_direct_map(void)
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP */
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> -int set_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn, bool unmap);
>> +int set_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn);
>>   int clear_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn);
>>   #else
>> -static inline int set_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn, bool unmap)
>> +static inline int set_mce_nospec(unsigned long pfn)
> 
> Looks like after this change the "whole_page()" helper can be deleted
> and the ->mce_whole_page flag in the task_struct can also go, right?
> In a follow-on of course.

Okay, will do in a follow-on patch.

> 
> Other than those small issues, this looks good!

thanks!
-jane

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ