[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89ad9e08-e0b2-d163-b089-c96ce70509b3@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:33:48 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, djakov@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm SDX65 DT
bindings
On 13/04/2022 08:29, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> On 4/12/2022 2:52 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/04/2022 07:07, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>>> Add interconnect IDs for Qualcomm SDX65 platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
>> (...)
>>
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx65.h b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx65.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..8d02c79
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx65.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> Is it possible to license it the same as bindings (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)?
>
> The qcom related code are marked as GPL 2.0 license
This I see here, unless you meant some other qcom related code?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists