linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] uio: make MAX_UIO_MAPS & MAX_UIO_PORT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGi-RUKVZyGaPBYNitnnjEMQ2_p3gTSUaMuKB7d8=E6-4UdBaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:55:47 +0300
From:   Ramon Fried <rfried.dev@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio: make MAX_UIO_MAPS & MAX_UIO_PORT_REGIONS configurable

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:46 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:40:09AM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:28 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:11:37AM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> > > > MAX_UIO_MAPS and MAX_UIO_PORT_REGIONS are hard-coded to 5.
> > > > This is not always sufficiant for some drivers.
> > >
> > > Why not?  What in-kernel drivers need more than this?
> > Obviously kernel drivers don't need more, but I'm developing a driver
> > that needs more.
>
> Great, let's consider this change at the same time you submit your
> driver, otherwise it doesn't make much sense now, right?
NP.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h