[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeLtUBrmBg1E=AdAkOQwMPYu74WtL2YuEacLdNA69PqqkDnyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 11:05:17 +0200
From: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wefu@...hat.com,
liush@...winnertech.com, guoren@...nel.org, atishp@...shpatra.org,
anup@...infault.org, drew@...gleboard.org, hch@....de,
arnd@...db.de, wens@...e.org, maxime@...no.tech,
gfavor@...tanamicro.com, andrea.mondelli@...wei.com,
behrensj@....edu, xinhaoqu@...wei.com, mick@....forth.gr,
allen.baum@...erantotech.com, jscheid@...tanamicro.com,
rtrauben@...il.com, samuel@...lland.org, cmuellner@...ux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/12] riscv: integrate alternatives better into the
main architecture
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 at 05:04, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
>
> Right now the alternatives need to be explicitly enabled and
> erratas are limited to SiFive ones.
>
> We want to use alternatives not only for patching soc erratas,
> but in the future also for handling different behaviour depending
> on the existence of future extensions.
>
> So move the core alternatives over to the kernel subdirectory
> and move the CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE to be a hidden symbol
> which we expect relevant erratas and extensions to just select
> if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists