[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220413093656.2538504-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 09:36:56 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: broonie@...nel.org
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-cadence-quadspi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/spi/spi-mem.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
index 0e8dafc62d94..7d7091aa0c22 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
@@ -262,9 +262,8 @@ static int spi_mem_access_start(struct spi_mem *mem)
if (ctlr->auto_runtime_pm) {
int ret;
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ctlr->dev.parent);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ctlr->dev.parent);
if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(ctlr->dev.parent);
dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "Failed to power device: %d\n",
ret);
return ret;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists