[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdb1e0a6-62f9-c0a3-c1db-8857087701a1@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 04:45:33 -0700
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@...il.com>, broonie@...nel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: wells.lu@...plus.com, lh.kuo@...plus.com, nathan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: remove spin_lock_irq in the irq procress
On 4/12/22 6:38 PM, Li-hao Kuo wrote:
> - remove spin_lock_irq and spin_unlock_irq in the irq funciton
function
I was expecting a statement on why is the lock is not needed.
Could you add one ?
Tom
>
> Signed-off-by: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
> index f989f7b..120623c 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
> @@ -199,8 +199,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sp7021_spi_master_irq(int irq, void *dev)
> if (tx_len == 0 && total_len == 0)
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&pspim->lock);
> -
> rx_cnt = FIELD_GET(SP7021_RX_CNT_MASK, fd_status);
> if (fd_status & SP7021_RX_FULL_FLAG)
> rx_cnt = pspim->data_unit;
> @@ -239,7 +237,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sp7021_spi_master_irq(int irq, void *dev)
>
> if (isrdone)
> complete(&pspim->isr_done);
> - spin_unlock_irq(&pspim->lock);
> +
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists