linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm SDX65 DT bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <954fae08-b11a-7a1b-b1b5-49fc2af660a6@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:54:58 +0530
From:   Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <agross@...nel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        <djakov@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm SDX65 DT
 bindings


On 4/13/2022 5:51 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/04/2022 14:14, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>> On 4/13/2022 12:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 13/04/2022 08:29, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>>>> On 4/12/2022 2:52 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 12/04/2022 07:07, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>>>>>> Add interconnect IDs for Qualcomm SDX65 platform.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
>>>>> (...)
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx65.h b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx65.h
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 0000000..8d02c79
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx65.h
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
>>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>>>>> Is it possible to license it the same as bindings (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)?
>>>> The qcom related code are marked as GPL 2.0 license
>>> This I see here, unless you meant some other qcom related code?
>> Yes, I meant the other codes as well because most of them I see (for eg.
>> sdx55) have added only GPL 2.0.
> Happens, maybe no one pointed out this. The bindings, including headers
> because these are part of bindings, are expected to have (GPL-2.0 OR
> BSD-2-Clause) license. Just because some bindings or some binding
> headers have GPL-2.0, is not a justification that wrong license should
> be used.

Okay, understood. Thanks for the clarification. Will update this 
immediately.

Thanks,
Rohit.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof