lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <897a05fd-a568-9d33-dc20-5de4e5d2188f@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:00:55 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, nm@...com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kishon@...com, tony@...mide.com,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, vigneshr@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] memory: omap-gpmc: Allow module build

On 13/04/2022 14:56, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>> If you have spare time, maybe you could investigate the compile testing
>> on other platforms as well and if something fails, fix it. But it seems
>> it is separate problem.
>>
> 
> I won't be able to test on all platforms. I'm ok to not add more dependency and
> just drop COMPILE_TEST.

I understand that. You can still test 8-12 popular ones on a regular
Ubuntu machine (there are like 10 or 12 cross compile toolchains now in
standard Ubuntu repos).

Another way is to put your patches on Github and ask kbuild folks to
test your trees. I think this was the repo (but double check):
https://github.com/fengguang/lkp-tests


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ