[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YlbRdCXnPPurC2wC@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:34:44 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Camel Guo <Camel.Guo@...s.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...s.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add TMP401, TMP411 and TMP43x
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:13:39AM +0000, Camel Guo wrote:
> On 4/12/22 23:36, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 03:52:31PM +0200, Camel Guo wrote:
> >> Document the TMP401, TMP411 and TMP43x device devicetree bindings
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Camel Guo <camel.guo@...s.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> +properties:
> >> + compatible:
> >> + enum:
> >> + - ti,tmp401
> >> + - ti,tmp411
> >> + - ti,tmp431
> >> + - ti,tmp432
> >> + - ti,tmp435
> >> +
> >> + reg:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >
> >> + '#address-cells':
> >> + const: 1
> >> +
> >> + '#size-cells':
> >> + const: 0
> >
> > You don't have any child nodes and these are for child nodes with 'reg'.
>
> Ack! I will fix it in v3.
> >
> >> +
> >> + ti,extended-range-enable:
> >> + description:
> >> + When set, this sensor measures over extended temperature range.
> >> + type: boolean
> >> +
> >> + ti,n-factor:
> >
> > Funny, I just ran across this property today for tmp421...
> >
> > Can the schema be shared?
>
> Yes, this property is in ti,tmp421.yaml and ti,tmp464.yaml as well. But
> I guess maybe it is better to separate tmp401 from them.
>
> That is because the chips supported in ti,tmp421,yaml has three channels
> and the chips supported in ti,tmp464.yaml has eight channels and this
> property n-factor is for each channel/child node. But the chips
> supported in ti,tmp401.yaml only has one channel. n-factor is for this
> chip.
Okay, that makes sense to keep them separate.
> >> + description:
> >> + value to be used for converting remote channel measurements to
> >> + temperature.
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >> + items:
> >> + minimum: 0
> >> + maximum: 255
> >
> > Isn't this property signed and should be -128 to -127? The code treats
> > the existing cases as signed. One schema is correct and one is like you
> > have it.
>
> Ack! will fix it in v3
>
> >
> >> +
> >> + ti,beta-compensation:
> >> + description:
> >> + value to select beta correction range.
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >> + items:
> >> + minimum: 0
> >> + maximum: 15
> >
> > Drop 'items'. It is not an array.
>
> Not sure if I understand correctly. Do you means it should be like this?
> If so, I guess ti,n-factor should also be changed like this. Am I right?
>
> ti,beta-compensation:
> description:
> value to select beta correction range.
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> minimum: 0
> maximum: 15
Yes, except your indentation is off. As-is, it's all 'description'. It
should be like this:
ti,beta-compensation:
description:
value to select beta correction range.
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
minimum: 0
maximum: 15
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists