[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220413134307.GC368031@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:43:07 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     "Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
Cc:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        "intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org" 
        <intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/34] drm/i915/gvt: cleanup the Makefile
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 01:39:35PM +0000, Wang, Zhi A wrote:
> It seems Jani's makefile clean patch has already included this one, I can
> just simply drop this one so that Christoph won't need to re-send everything.
> 
> For the branch to move on, I am merging the patches and will re-generate the
> gvt-staging branch, which combines the newest drm-tip vfio-upstream and other
> gvt branches.
> 
> If you are in a rush of re-basing the patches of non-GVT-g stuff, you can use
> gvt-staging branch until my pull request landed in drm-intel-next.
> 
> Also our QA will test gvt-staging-branch before the pull request. I suppose
> it will take one or two days.
When you are wrangling the branches it would be great if Christoph's
series and it's minimal dependencies could be on a single branch that
could reasonably be pulled to the VFIO tree too, thanks
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
