linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Prepare cleanup of powerpc's asm/prom.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:20:11 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Prepare cleanup of powerpc's asm/prom.h

On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 8:27 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 01-04-22, 19:24, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > powerpc's asm/prom.h brings some headers that it doesn't
> > need itself.
> >
> > In order to clean it up, first add missing headers in
> > users of asm/prom.h
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c      | 1 -
> >  drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c      | 2 +-
> >  drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c      | 2 +-
> >  drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c     | 1 -
> >  drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c | 2 +-
> >  5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
> > index 815645170c4d..039a66bbe1be 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
> >
> >  #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
> >  #include <asm/io.h>
> > -#include <asm/prom.h>
> >  #include <asm/time.h>
> >  #include <asm/smp.h>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
> > index 4f20c6a9108d..20f64a8b0a35 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > -#include <asm/prom.h>
> > +
> >  #include <asm/machdep.h>
> >  #include <asm/irq.h>
> >  #include <asm/pmac_feature.h>
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
> > index d7542a106e6b..ba9c31d98bd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/completion.h>
> >  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > -#include <asm/prom.h>
> > +
> >  #include <asm/machdep.h>
> >  #include <asm/irq.h>
> >  #include <asm/sections.h>
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
> > index c58abb4cca3a..e3313ce63b38 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
> > @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >
> >  #include <asm/machdep.h>
> > -#include <asm/prom.h>
> >  #include <asm/cell-regs.h>
> >
> >  #include "ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h"
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
> > index 037fe23bc6ed..4fba3637b115 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c
> > @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> >  #include <asm/processor.h>
> > -#include <asm/prom.h>
> >  #include <asm/pmi.h>
> >  #include <asm/cell-regs.h>
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Applied as 5.19 material.

If the powerpc folks decide to take it, I can drop it, so please let me know.