linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 1/4] hugetlb: Fix wrong use of nr_online

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220413032915.251254-2-liupeng256@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 03:29:12 +0000
From:   Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>
To:     <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, <david@...hat.com>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <yaozhenguo1@...il.com>,
        <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        <liuyuntao10@...wei.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <liupeng256@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] hugetlb: Fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes

Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes. In
this case, nr_online_nodes can not be used to walk through numa node.
Also, a valid node may be greater than nr_online_nodes.

However, in hugetlb, it is assumed that nodes are contiguous. Recheck
all the places that use nr_online_nodes, and repair them one by one.

Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Fixes: 4178158ef8ca ("hugetlbfs: fix issue of preallocation of gigantic pages can't work")
Fixes: b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
Fixes: e79ce9832316 ("hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter")
Fixes: f9317f77a6e0 ("hugetlb: clean up potential spectre issue warnings")
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index b34f50156f7e..5b5a2a5a742f 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2979,7 +2979,7 @@ int __alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
 	struct huge_bootmem_page *m = NULL; /* initialize for clang */
 	int nr_nodes, node;
 
-	if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE && nid >= nr_online_nodes)
+	if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_online(nid))
 		return 0;
 	/* do node specific alloc */
 	if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
@@ -3088,7 +3088,7 @@ static void __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages(struct hstate *h)
 	}
 
 	/* do node specific alloc */
-	for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++) {
+	for_each_online_node(i) {
 		if (h->max_huge_pages_node[i] > 0) {
 			hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_onenode(h, i);
 			node_specific_alloc = true;
@@ -4049,7 +4049,7 @@ static int __init hugetlb_init(void)
 			default_hstate.max_huge_pages =
 				default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
 
-			for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++)
+			for_each_online_node(i)
 				default_hstate.max_huge_pages_node[i] =
 					default_hugepages_in_node[i];
 		}
@@ -4164,9 +4164,9 @@ static int __init hugepages_setup(char *s)
 				pr_warn("HugeTLB: architecture can't support node specific alloc, ignoring!\n");
 				return 0;
 			}
-			if (tmp >= nr_online_nodes)
+			if (!node_online(tmp))
 				goto invalid;
-			node = array_index_nospec(tmp, nr_online_nodes);
+			node = array_index_nospec(tmp, MAX_NUMNODES);
 			p += count + 1;
 			/* Parse hugepages */
 			if (sscanf(p, "%lu%n", &tmp, &count) != 1)
@@ -4294,7 +4294,7 @@ static int __init default_hugepagesz_setup(char *s)
 	 */
 	if (default_hstate_max_huge_pages) {
 		default_hstate.max_huge_pages = default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
-		for (i = 0; i < nr_online_nodes; i++)
+		for_each_online_node(i)
 			default_hstate.max_huge_pages_node[i] =
 				default_hugepages_in_node[i];
 		if (hstate_is_gigantic(&default_hstate))
-- 
2.18.0.huawei.25